"9. RANDAZZA ETAL V. COX, BERNSTEIN ET AL., CASE NO.2:12‐CV‐02040‐GMN‐PAL (HEREBYFULLYINCORPORATED BYREFERENCE INENTIRETY HEREIN,ALLPLEADINGS,ORDERS,ETC.)
86. That on November 28th, 2012 Randazza of RLG, former Attorney of Cox, now files
District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL against his former client Cox and
allegedly against Plaintiff directly.
87. That on November 30th, 2012, the WIPO decision against Cox and Plaintiff obtained
through the conflicts of interest of Michaelson is then used to support the allegations
against Cox and Plaintiff to the Nevada court as evidence of their criminal acts,"
Source, Page 69
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130512%20FINAL%20Motion%20to%20Rehear%20and%20Reopen%20Obstruction%20of%20Justice165555%20WITH%20EXHIBITS.pdf
Monday, May 13, 2013
WIPO is NOT Above the Law. Francis Gurry is NOT above the Law. Peter L. Michaelson WIPO Panelist is NOT above the LAW. Marc J. Randazza is NOT above the LAW.
"77. That WIPO has no legal capacity to rule on criminal matters or to allege publically in a
decision that anyone is acting criminally based on their findings, without that person
being found guilty by the proper criminal authorities, yet this is exactly what happened,
again illustrating another abuse of process that defames Plaintiff"
Source, Page 65
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130512%20FINAL%20Motion%20to%20Rehear%20and%20Reopen%20Obstruction%20of%20Justice165555%20WITH%20EXHIBITS.pdf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)