Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Crystal Cox Counterclaims, Declaration of Facts in Randazza vs. Cox District of Nevada.

Document 254, Randazza v. Cox;


Defendant, Counter Plaintiff

Plaintiffs, Counter Defendant

                                                                         Declaration / Statement of Facts / Testimony

On or about December 10th, 2011, one of my Bloggers on my Independent Blog Network, contacted me regarding his contacting an attorney named Marc Randazza. (See Exhibit 18)

I had just lost a major free speech case ( Obsidian Finance Group vs. Cox) and he thought Marc Randazza would be a good fit, and may represent me for Free, as he had just had some TSA case in the media.

I had never heard of attorney Marc Randazza, however, I agreed to have a 3 way phone conversation regarding the possibility of me agreeing to allow Mr. Randazza to represent me, in what had quickly become my high profile First Amendment Case. (see Exhibit 18 to show the initial conversation regarding scheduling a conference call, sending court documents.)

On December 6th, 2011 I had previously spoke to UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh. He called me and asked if he could represent me on my Appeal of Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox and with absolutely no cost to me.

Eugene Volokh is a law professor and does not practice law regularly. So he had to get the final approval of the law firm Mayer Brown LLP. Therefore I had not had firm representation yet from him when I spoke with Marc Randazza. And was open to both or either of them representing me on my Ninth Circuit Appeal, at that time.

On my representation conference call with Marc Randazza, we discussed my strategy for my appeal, as well as my strengths and weaknesses and what I was willing to do and not willing to do.

Randazza told me I had made a mess of the case and he would have to look over all the documentation to decide if he would be able to take my case. Randazza told me that Big Media had a monopoly on Free Speech and that is just the way it is.

Randazza attempted to get me to not appeal, by telling me it was best for all of society if I did not appeal. Randazza asked me my strategy, what I was open to in moving forward, and what I was not. He questioned me on many aspects of my intentions for my appeal.

Randazza told me that he represented the Media Association for Bloggers and may have a conflict of interest in representing me, and that he would get back to me after I gave him all of the documents of my case and he checked with them.

On December 15th, As Exhibit 20 shows, Randazza and Volokh were working with, and keeping Cox in the loop on their representation and the case strategy. They were discussing ordering court documents and had phone calls discussion how to best move forward with my case. They were both representing Cox at that time and in talks about the case with the courts, other attorney and Cox.

Thereafter, it came to my attention that Randazza had contacted attorney David Aman, the opposition in my case, and was negotiating a deal that would stop my appeal and somehow change the status of the judgement .  Eugene Volokh told me this in a phone call and as you see in emails of Dec. 15th, 2011, in Exhibit 1

As seen in Exhibit 21, On December 16th 2011 at 9:21 am, I fired Randazza. I told him he does not represent me and that only Eugene Volokh represents me.

Also seen in Exhibit 21,  On December 16th 2011 at 12:55 PM Randazza says he has no issue with me doing that and offers to help me in the future in anyway he can.

Exhibit 21 shows that Marc respect Cox, apologized if I felt not treated well and said that
"People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed."

It shows he lied about representation. and admits to trying to broker a deal on Cox's behalf, which is the very definition of "representation.  Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "I did tell the opposing counsel that I thought a deal might be brokered".

Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "Despite the contents of this email, I wish to let you know that I am sill willing to lend a hand in any way - even in the background."

Cox took her former client, who claimed to humbly respect her, apologize, say people like her were need, at his word. Cox truly believed that Randazza was sincere in letting him know if he could help, even in the background. Cox had lost her home, lost her income and needed a job, this was the help she needed. She simply asked Randazza if he knew anyone or would hire Cox for PR work and yet he maliciously, deliberately and knowing the truth painted to the world that Cox had extorted him.  Knowing full well that he did not believe this, he simply want to teach Cox a lesson, intimidate her and ruin her life.

In which he succeeded. He convinced the world Cox was a criminal who had attacked his infant daughter. This ruined Cox's family relationships, business, friendships, ability to rent a home and has left Cox desolate, homeless and unable to rent, to work or to secure clients.
As all exhibits show, Marc Randazza was acting as my attorney. He worked with others in this representation such as Eugene Volokh and the opposition David Aman.

Cox would have kept Randazza on with Volokh had he not lied to her, berated her, presented deals to the opposition without her permission or knowledge of what they were, in her 2.5 million dollar judgment and the appeal.

Randazza retaliated against his former client, and Exhibit 21 proves that he did so with intent, maliciously and after claiming, offering to be of any kind of help.

On January 16th, 2012 Cox emailed Randazza asking for a possible job or job recommendation. On January 17th Randazza emailed Cox back. See Exhibit 17.

Exhibit 17 shows that, though Randazza was upset that Cox registered the domain name he did not believe she had a reasonable or ethical right to own, he did not tell her he believed it was against the law, or extortion in any way.

Randazza is well known for defending the rights of others to have domain names with other people's names in it, such as the Glenn Beck case he was in.

I, Crystal Cox, had also won a WIPO case with the domain names of 3 Proskauer Rose attorneys in them and had one that case, therefore I had no reason to believe it would be an issue.

I, Crystal Cox, assumed he would have no issue with it, as I had read his legal arguments and thought, at the time he was a true proponent of Free Speech rights for all.

Exhibit 17 CLEARLY shows that Counter Defendant Marc Randazza did not have an issue with Cox asking him for a Job.

In fact Exhibit 17 shows clearly, without a doubt that Randazza did not believe he was being extorted, but that in fact, he believed Cox was unreasonable and unethical for registering the domain name, but that she was just asking for a job.

Exhibit 17 proves that Randazza, with full knowledge of it being false, interviewed and flat out lied, made false and defamatory statements to NPR, Forbes, the New York Times, WIPO, the Czech Courts, Tracy Coenen and the Fraud Files, Kenneth White attorney blogger of and numerous other well connected bloggers, and Media around the world.   As well as made these false and defamatory statement in courts and on his own blog. KNOWING full well that it was false.

RANDAZZA gave blogger attorney Kenneth P. White of Cox's personal, priviliged, private email to her former attorney who told her to let him know if he could help her in any way, and he used this email to paint Cox in false light, deliberately not posting the whole email thread which showed that he knew Cox was asking for a job.

Therefore because Cox would not simply turn over a domain name he thought she had no right to own, he went on NPR, interviewed with the New York Times, Forbes,, and he viciously, deliberately, knowing it was false, lied, made false statements to WIPO who used their global clout to ruin the lives of Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox and accuse them worldwide and nationwide, in legal blogs, in big and small media, that Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein ( who never was even in the email) had extorted him, which is a felony crime.

Cox is entitled to relief for the damage Randazza has caused her, though Cox has no attorney or way to articulate this evidence on a legal basis. Cox has valid claims and exhibit 17 further proves this.

Exhibit 17 shows that Randazza was "deeply offended" and that he did not think Cox was reasonable or ethical. However, Randazza clearly never claimed Cox was extorting him, nor did he believe this at the time. Yet later, in retaliation, he deliberately defamed Cox in a widespread, malicious, willful and wanton campaign of revenge, harassment, and widespread posting and speaking false and defamatory statements against Cox to third parties. This ruined Cox's life, quality of life and business. This also put Cox in constant danger, duress and up against massive, widespread hate in big and small media around the world.  And simply for registering a domain name and asking for a job.

Randazza has caused Cox irreparable damage.

Exhibit 17 shows Counter Defendant Marc Randazza Say, "Asking me for a job, or a recommendation?  That doesn't bother me in the least."  Yet because Cox did not do as he told her to, he retaliated and ruined her life. And told countless media that he was not only bothered by it but put in terror, stress and extreme duress over it. Which was untrue and Exhibit 17 shows this.

Approx. March 30th, 2012, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza began publishing false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Plaintiff Crystal Cox, attacking a 3 year old online. Defendant Kashmir Hill then interviewed, spoke with Counter Defendant Marc Randazza and published these same  false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Plaintiff Crystal Cox. (Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 8)

On April 2nd 2012, Defendant Kashmir Hill began  publishing false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Plaintiff Crystal Cox, attacking a 3 year old. Plaintiff Crystal Cox had no blog about a 3 year old, made no statements online about this three year old, yet Defendant Kashmir Hill knowingly posted false and defamatory information regarding Counter Plaintiff Cox.  (Exhibit 8)

Jordan Rushie, then of Mulvihill and Rushie LLC now an attorney with Randazza Legal Group, published false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Cox, in an article on Philly Law Blow, by Jordan Rushie, Titled " The Evolution of Crystal Cox: Anatomy of a Scammer", dated, April 3rd 2012.  Jordan Rushie posted false and defamatory statements regarding Cox being guilty of extortion and attacking a three year old.  (Exhibit 7 and 7a, and Exhibit 15)
On April 6th 2012, Bob Garfield interviewed  Counter Defendant Marc Randazza on Defendant wNYC,  New York Public Radio. The show was called “COMBATING "BAD" SPEECH WITH MORE SPEECH”, Dated, April 06, 2012. On the Media, as Exhibits show.  Bob Garfield and Counter Defendant Marc Randazza stated false and defamatory, slanderous statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox. Bob Garfield and Counter Defendant Marc Randazza accused Counter Plaintiff Cox of attacking a child online, of being guilty of extortion, and all manner of unethical and criminal activity. These  false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox in this world wide medium of communication has caused Counter Plaintiff Cox immeasurable, irreparable damage.  (Exhibit 4)

On Jun 18th 2012, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza filed a Czech court complaint against Counter Plaintiff Cox and Eliot Bernstein, to initiate a domain name dispute. In this case, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza stated false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox.  Counter Defendant Marc Randazza used Kashmir Hill, Jordan Rushie and David Carr’s false and defamatory statements as his evidence to steal the intellectual property of Counter Plaintiff Cox.

Essential using his own interviews with them as purported and believed evidence, though it was false and defamatory statements of fact with willful, wanton, deliberate and malicious intent.

On July 27th 2012, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza filed a WIPO complaint against Counter Plaintiff Cox and Eliot Bernstein, to initiate a domain name dispute. In this case, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza stated false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox.  Counter Defendant Marc Randazza use Kashmir Hill, Jordan Rushie and David Carr’s false and defamatory statements as his evidence to steal the intellectual property of Counter Plaintiff Cox. Counter Defendant Marc Randazza also stated to third party WIPO that Counter Plaintiff Cox was guilty of Extortion and had also extorted him, yet attorney Counter Defendant Marc Randazza had filed no criminal charges against Cox nor allowed her due process of law.  ( Exhibit 2)

As Exhibits 2-8 AND 10-16 show Big and Small Media as well as attorney bloggers, radio shows, international intellectual property law, legal publications, the associated press, small and large bloggers and publishers and more picked up the story or were directly told by Randazza false and defamatory statements and told to post his version of the facts, which, as Exhibits show, were clearly false and defamatory and with full knowledge of the law and their falsehood.

This has been written to the best of my knowledge and truest ability.

Cox seeks all allowable relief, as a matter of law for the damage Randazza has done to her.

Crystal L. Cox, Pro Se
Counter Plaintiff / Defendant

Certification of Service

On April 6 , 2015, Crystal Cox certifies mailing a copy of this to:

U.S. District Court
Clerk of Court
Room 1334
333 Las Vegas Blvd. S.
Las Vegas , NV 89101

Exhibit 18 Links

Exhibit 22

EXHIBIT - Randazza is deeply offended but knows Cox was asking for a job and not attempting to extort him.

My Personal Experience with Nevada Attorney Marc Randazza and the Randazza Legal Group Law Firm by Blogger Crystal Cox, Randazza's former client and target of a SLAPP suit he filed to silence me, steal my blogs, and suppress my First Amendment Rights.

In my experience Nevada Attorney Marc Randazza abuses the court process to create a media and blog storm of false information in order to affect court cases and get whatever it is that he wants from the target litigant, oftentimes that is simply REVENGE. 

Marc Randazza files court court motions and lawsuits against litigants, says whatever defamatory and false statement he wants, then he get's his buddies, a group of attorneys, tech bloggers, and other online media to report on the story. Another words to quote his version of the facts of the case.

These gang stalking attorneys think that if they keep posting the LIE that the courts and public will believe it, just because they are the "authority". And guess what? It works. And these flat out lies, opinions and allegations made by these "experts" in the field, attorneys and well known media are then used in court cases as actual evidence and it works, though it is NOT adjudicated. 

Such as Marc Randazza did to get a preliminary injunction against blogger Crystal Cox, me, and steal massive domain names without First Amendment Adjudication.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group operate in multiple states and Canada. Do you homework folks, if Marc Randazza targets you, odds are VERY high you will not win, and you will pay his legal fees to attack you. And if he really has it out for ya, he will paint you as a CRIMINAL and try and set you up for some prison time.

Marc Randazza abuses the power of the courts and his connections with media, attorneys, judges, and more to target litigants and create illusions for personal gain.

In my experience Marc Randazza uses bloggers, attorneys, court filings, motions, protective orders, his own blog, twitter and other big and small media outlets and connections to harass, defame, bully, and taunt his target. He and his “friends” do this to affect court cases, created evidence to give to judges, and to manipulate the legal process.

In my case, Randazza v. CoxMarc Randazza, his wife Jennifer Randazza and their 3 old daughter sued me. Yes a 3 year old entered into a "contract" per say, and sued a blogger.

Marc Randazza filed the lawsuit against me, Crystal Cox, in November of 2012. After he filed the lawsuit, he did NOT bother to serve me, email me nor notify me in any way. Though he had my email because he was my attorney for a short time. And he had also emailed me threatening I either give him or suffer the toll of him being my enemy.

Instead of contacting me, serving me. He simply stated his version of the truth and fact, in which I say are flat out lies, false information and bad law. Then he got his gang stalkers to report on the case. I believe TechDirt was the first. I did not even know I was sued and here this case was being used to defame me, trash me, and to harm other cases I was in.

I read it online and contacted the courts to serve myself so I could set the record straight. That did not work as his buddies, the courts, the judges, godaddy, legal bloggers, media; well they said whatever Marc Randazza told them to and the facts, evidence and TRUTH was simply not something they bother to or cared to look into.

Marc Randazza also used his buddies, connections, and those I am told and allege that he paid to taunt me online, to text me threats and to make me feel as if I was in constant danger, under constant surveillance and had no life I could live outside of what Marc Randazza allowed.

Purpose of Randazza v. Cox

The sole purpose of this lawsuit, this SLAPP suit with no merit, in my opinion, was simply to paint me in false light, intimidate me, cost me energy, ruin the quality of my life, ruin my reputation, and teach me a "lesson" for stand up to Marc Randazza and exercising my Free Speech to say what I wanted about him.

Marc Randazza has had my blogs removed, redirected domain names and shut down massive online content where I exercised my Free Speech and talked about him, spoke critical of him. And at the same time tries to convince the public that he is for Free Speech for all. And that I am the exception because I used his Trademark? Really? How do you speak critical of a person or business and not use their name, which Marc Randazza calls a "Trademark"?

Marc Randazza had no legal leg to stand on in this legal action and should NOT have wasted the courts time, as seen in this ORDER denying his summary judgment against me and pointing out all his legal flaws in his case.

Marc Randazza sues his target in order to pressure them to settle, to pay his fees, or give him what he wants, whatever that may be. In my case he wanted domain names, blogs, videos and other online content that exercised my Free Speech right to expose, report on, speak critical of and rant on Marc Randazza, Jennifer Randazza and Randazza Legal Group.

Mostly I believe in my case and in suing Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers was also a woman hating move, a I will teach you a lesson, ruin your life, taunt you, destroy you and there is nothing you can do about it sort of deal. As in I am Marc Randazza and will do as I damn well please to who ever I want and there is nothing you can do about it.

Marc Randazza supports the Free Speech rights of those in prison, those who have horrific domain names, those who are racists and clearly, publicly supports Pedophiles rights to free speech. Yet he sues 2 women who stand up to him, and calls that Trademark violations? WOW.

It is rather shocking that Marc Randazza CENSORS me and Monica Foster, yet pretends he, being a porn attorney and pedophile supporter after all, is for the Free Speech rights or all. Marc Randazza often is heard saying if you love Free Speech you gotta lve it all AND the way to combat bad speech is more speech and other very hypocritical gibberish he most assuredly does not walk the talk of.

Marc Randazza abuses his Court Authority

Marc Randazza sues his target and then uses this to get private, personal business contacts, intellectual property, secrets on how they do business and who the do it with, all their domain names and businesses, names of clients and customers, phone records, your home address, emails and phone numbers of your family and ex's, and as much information he can get.

Marc Randazza uses his lawsuit to then be an officer of the court and get phone companies, churches, registrars and anyone else he wants to give him YOUR private information and they DO IT, trusting that he, as an attorney, as an officer of the court is obeying the LAW; when clearly he is NOT.

NO one seems to hold him accountable and they even seem to fear him for some reason; he is "well connected" and your constitutional rights are out the window.

How Does Marc Randazza, an attorney convince 3rd party vendors, phone companies, pastors, churches, accountants, friends, family, clients, ex's, customers and more to GIVE him YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION... ???

Well you see Marc Randazza threatens to sue them, subpoena them and well they are afraid of legal fees, time from work or a "scene" of some kind so they turn this information over to this officer of the court, even though it VIOLATES your rights to privacy.

Marc Randazza defends celebrities and other "folk" on their right to privacy in emails, yet he took my private emails to him and others, even though he was my attorney and even though it violated the rules of evidence, constitution and privacy rights, he and his gang stalking buddies used my private emails out of context and with their insinuations of what I must have meant, to ruin my life, defame me, harass me, bully me and attack me.

All the while creating an online buzz of their buddies (the gang stalkers) and influencing potential jurors and the courts, as well as printing out their lies and submitting it as FACTUAL evidence. Judges, such as Judge Gloria Navarro eat this up and consider it fact and give Marc Randazza your life's work, your domains, your blogs, your rights, and your intellectual property ALL based on LIES and non adjudicated nonsense they submit as evidence.

And there is NOTHING you can do about it; YEP NOTHING

Marc Randazza defends those with sick domain names such as, yet he STOLE my domains such as

more on the Glen Beck case

Marc Randazza makes the opposite argument there of course.

Randazza took many of my domain names and intellectual property with NO First Amendment Adjudication through flat out lies to WIPO and with NO Trademark. And through unconstitutional preliminary injunctions. Which as you clearly see in the Raanan Katz v. Irina Chevaldina case, Marc Randazza claimed in court motions in that case that preliminary injunctions were unconstitutional. Marc Randazza is a flat out hypocrite.

Also FOLKS, "First Amendment Rights TRUMP Trademark Laws

Even if you believe his lies that I attacked his child by buying a domain name, he is still a hypocrite. Marc Randazza LOVES free speech but only if he is paid to defend it. And even if I had a blog about his child, which I did not. Is that Illegal? Or is it Free Speech?

Godaddy profits from the ads, the sale of such names not me. And I have every right to use any domain I want and stand up against Marc Randazza who supports the Free Speech rights of pedophiles but sues, bullies, taunts and harasses me, Crystal Cox for years because he, a domain name lawyer was to dumb to buy his dotcom, his wife's and his child's. My point was to prove he falsifies his authority as knowledgeable in the domain name industry as the dumbass did not even have those names. Ya I called his wife a SLUT. I like sluts, it was not meant to be a slam, just what I saw to be a fact from my perspective. However, as seen on Marc Randazza's own blog he said he knocked her up in a drunken tryst so he may as well marry her. Well let's see, sex with a porn attorney, no protection ummm hmmm so many questions as to what was really going on there, the rumors are rampant on that one. Ya in my opinion and life experience, I still have to go with Slut, sorry just how I see it.

Marc Randazza is so full of it on his Trademark Allegations

Marc Randazza claims he sued Crystal Cox, me, to protect his trademark, yet he filed for the Trademark AFTER he sued me, and well ya see he claims it was to avoid confusion. Ya,, and the dozens of others he STOLE from me ILLEGALLY and Unconstitutionally, there was NO WAY they would have confused a consumer.

Marc Randazza wanted revenge so he sued me, stalked me, subpoenaed my friends, ex's, clients, customers and even had a private investigator follow me. Marc Randazza ruined my life because he was BUTTHURT.

Then Marc Randazza claims I had a satire of his daughter, and put the photo in as evidence then his law firm represents Jennifer Randazza aKa SLUT in suing Monica Foster saying it was her parody and she is the one to be sued for this Free Speech protected PARODY.

Also at the time Marc Randazza sued me, Crystal Cox, for using his alleged (LOL) good name, oh and for calling his wife a SLUT, well he was in all manner of media defending Rush Limbaugh for calling Sandra Fluke a SLUT. Marc Randazza says it is unAmerican to suppress the free speech rights of Rush Limbaugh to call Sandra Fluke a SLUT. But Crystal Cox, me, well that's just his duty as a daddy and a husband right, to SUPPRESS my First Amendment / Free Speech Rights.

Oh wait but he defends the opposite in this video

When it comes to Free Speech, Marc Randazza says ya gotta love it all Howie, when someone called his wife a slut but when I point out the obvious slut, well I get sued, threatened, stalked, harassed, defamed, and ruined.
Ya Howie, ya gotta love it all Videos

But you better not call Ms. Randazza a SLUT, though in Definition well she sure seems a Slut to me and on top of that, non-protected sex with a porn attorney seems a bit irresponsible in my "Opinion". Oh then there is my Free Speech right to call whomever I want a Slut right? Being a Slut is not illegal.

Marc Randazza LOVES to flat out state, and with seemingly no regard for the law, that his "target" is GUILTY of a crime of which he has NOT the balls nor evidence to file a criminal complaint.

Marc Randazza acts as if he is pro Free Speech but sued me Crystal Cox for calling him names, exposing him and calling his wife a slut.

Marc Randazza sued Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers for a parody about him. Marc Randazza is the KING of, hey I am the one dishing it out here and YOU are the one taking it. If you don’t like it I will sue you, defame you, ruin you, harass you, taunt you until you lay down and take it. Marc Randazza is a hypocrite and ABOVE THE LAW.

Links to research Marc Randazza suppressing Monica Foster’s speech and suing her for “parody” though he had claimed in federal court that I made that parody, then sues her. Oh and all this after his career or defending the Free Speech right of Parody.

Below is her Answer to the Complaint, with lot's of Exhibits
(Randazza v. Mayers A-14-699072-C, District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Eighth Judicial District)

Marc Randazza can DISH it out but he CANNOT take it that's for sure. SUE SUE SUE.

Look Deep into the Joseph Rakofsky case, those are the same gang stalking players

The Joseph Rakofsky case has tons of internet posts from Marc Randazza's gang stalking group. They used the internet to make the case look like something is what not. Joseph Rakofsky was telling the truth and all these same guys are stalking, lying and ganging up on a lot of us, hence a RICO.

Look at all the Documents of the Joseph Rakofsky v. the Internet; Marc Randazza and his GANG are all there defending each other and I allege flat out lying about the facts of the case.

Look deep into Righthaven and many other cases where the same group of attorneys taunt, gang stalk and create an illusion online. They pick a target and together legal bloggers such as’s Kenneth White of Brown, White and Newhouse Law Firm, Tracy Coenen of Sequence Inc., Kashmir Hill of Forbes and formerly of, Jordan Rushie of Philly Law Blog (he is now a Randazza Legal Group attorney), Bob Garfield of New York Public Radio, Godaddy, Lawyer and blogger Mark Bennett of Bennett and Bennett Law Firm,Lawyer Scott H. Greenfield of the Simple Justice Blog,  Eric Turkewitz of Turkewitz Law Firm, and more.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group also use Marc’s connections to Peter L. Michaelson of “Mediator & Arbitrator with Michaelson ADR Chambers” and INTA, in order to get WIPO, the World Intellectual Property Organization, to defame, harass, tarness, ruin, threaten and bully his target.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group use WIPO as they are a highly credible international organization and what WIPO says is BELIEVED, even if it has no base in fact whatsoever and only the word of one Lawyer who flat out lied to them, Marc Randazza.

This group of gang stalkers are believed by the courts, judges and the public over their TARGET as they have credentials and clout and this forces people into settlement’s and Randazza usually gets his way.

This rogue group is acting illegally, and there is plenty of pattern and history which is why I, Crystal L. Cox tried to file a RICO Lawsuit against them and was denied

Here are links to research that

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group have been known to sue someone and force them to pay the legal fees to do it and Judge Gloria Navarro assists them. They take a case for FREE allegedly then force their clients to pay.

More on that topic

Pro Bono Scam

I ALLEGE that Marc Randazza files legal documents, lawsuits and court motions with the premeditate willful and wanton intent to defame, attack, and flat out lie about his “Target” then he gets his attorney buddies to all post on the case and to quote him, as if it were adjudicated fact, when it's only the words of one attorney out to get whatever he wants out of that particular case.

They use the laws that protect court documents to defame and destroy their target. Then these blogs of lies and opinions of Rogue Attorneys become “Evidence” to further destroy their target.

A Quote from the Recent Roca Labs case 
filed against Marc Randazza

"Despite being an Officer of the Court and a practicing member of the Florida Bar, RANDAZZA has waged his war against ROCA by intentionally and maliciously publishing many false and defamatory statements in his pleadings, with the intent to share them to his contacts in the media, and indeed by directly speaking to the media about ROCA with the intent to have them publish false, misleading and defamatory articles about ROCA, and by harassing and making derogatory statements about ROCA via his personal social media sites including his Twitter account"

Source and Full Legal Action against First Amendment PORN Attorney Marc Randazza aKa scumbag, hypocritical asshole, liar, and lawless.

Look deep at the Joseph Rakofsky case, the Crystal Cox case, the Roca Labs case and more cases of Randazza Legal Group. There are others that allege these same attorneys and bloggers, media outlets have done this same thing to aid and abet Randazza Legal Group. Do your Homework. It is the same group of attorneys, bloggers, forensics investigators such as Tracy Coenen, every time the same people help Randazza to affect the outcome he wants in legal cases.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group use court filings to ruin people’s lives, businesses, defame them, bully them, harass them and teach them a “lesson” or as Marc says “make an enemy of me”.

It is clear to see that Marc Randazza defends the side he is paid to, as do most attorneys. However Marc Randazza takes it to a level of evil, of above the law and he manipulates his power and privilege as an attorney in a legal system that has not caught up with the Internet, in order to win case and seek revenge in such a way that violates our constitutional rights. 

There is plenty of evidence to prove what these folks do, however, I am only one woman and have no resources to fight them. I have done the best I can to the best of my ability. They continue to create more victims, the latest being Roca Labs.

In my opinion, Marc Randazza should have a RICO against him, should be charged with Criminal Defamation among many other illegal and unethical actions he seems to allegedly take against whomever he has a beef with or wants something from.

If you have any questions or wish to represent me against any of these folks in legal action, please eMail me at or

Believe the Lie, or the TRUTH; Suit Yourself. 

They do say Ignorance is Bliss.

No matter what you Believe; the TRUTH will still be the Truth


More Research Links

Crystal Cox on Marc Randazza's Tactics

More Research Links