Friday, February 22, 2013

I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, am an Investigative Blogger, I have read thousands of pages of documents over 3 years, listened to Senate Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings, read depositions, read billing documents, listening to depositions, read court filings, read NDA agreements, and massive amounts of proof of the liability that Intel has in regard to the Undisclosed Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology Infringement.


Crystal L. Cox
Pro Se Counter Plaintiff
District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Thursday, February 21st 2013
Steven R. Rodgers
Vice President of Legal, Corporate Affairs and 
Deputy General Counsel of Litigation, Licensing & Patents, Intel Corporation
Douglas Melamed 
Intel Corp. General Counsel

Regarding: Complaint - NOTICE of Liability; Notice of Claim Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel, INTC Shareholders and Others.  Notice to all Intel Executives, Shareholders, Board Members, Insurance Providers, Auditors, and all financially connected to Intel Corp., INTC in any way. 

Douglas Melamed, Steven R. Rodgers and Whom It May Concern:
This notice is written upon the Knowledge and Belief of Investigative Blogger Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox.  I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, write this letter to notify you of legal action pending against Intel, INTC in the District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Lawsuit, whereby Intel Corp. and Steven R. Rodgers are named Defendants.
The Original Complaint in this case was Electronically Served On December 27th 2012 and again in an Amended Complaint on On January  27th 2013.
Notice was sent to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation, who is named Personally and Professionally, On December 27th 2012 and again in an Amended Complaint on On January  27th 2013. As well as updated court documents.   Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation has ignored this serious legal matter, and it is assumed has failed to notify auditors, shareholders, Intel Ceo’s, and all who should be notified of this massive liability to Intel Corp. Regarding District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.
Upon information and belief, the frauds included but are not limited to the failure of Intel Corp., INTC, to disclose both this lawsuit and the Intellectual Property infringement of the iViewit Technology, which is a Trillion dollar liability to Intel, INTC Shareholders and the Intel Corporation.
Intel Corp., INTC executives have known of this massive liability over violations of NDA’s and infringement of the iViewit Video Technology for over a Decade. 
Ex-Senior Vice President, General Counsel of Intel Corp., INTC, Bruce Sewell, now General Counsel of APPLE, Corresponded with Eliot Bernstein regarding this massive undisclosed liability. I, Crystal Cox have attached those correspondences to this Notice of Liability, as well as added links at the bottom of this letter. 
Eliot Bernstein, founder of iViewit Technology Company, and one of the inventors of the iViewit Video Technology, is named as a Defendant in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL. This is alleged to be, in order to suppress Internet Blogs, Domain Names and Online Media reporting on the iViewit Technology theft, which involves Intel Corp., INTC, as noted in the iViewit Technology SEC Complaint, RICO Complaint, FBI Complaints, USPTO Complaint and other Federal Investigations into this matter. 
In regard to Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technology Company, Intel Corp., INTC has massive, undisclosed liabilities and this notice is to warn all those financially tied to INTC, Intel Corporation of this massive liability. Failing to disclose this liability is in direct violation of various SEC laws and rules including but not limited to FASB No. 5 requirements for disclosing liabilities and more. 
The Eliot Bernstein and the iViewit Technology Company, also involves an attempted murder of his family and a car bombing that blew up three vehicles in addition to Bernstein Vehicle.
The iViewit Technology theft is a very serious matter, and a massive, undisclosed liability to Intel, INTC. The iViewit Technology theft  involves high stakes corporate theft and fraud of a 13 Trillion Dollar Intellectual Property .Notably, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin referred to the iViewit Case 
as a case involving Murder that has also been marked as legally “related” by Scheindlin
to an ongoing Federal Whistleblower case, the Christine Anderson case. 
Steven Rodgers Vice President has allegedly conspired with WIPO, Director Francis Gurry, and also WIPO Legal Edward Kwawkwa and also Eric Wilbers of WIPO, in order to wipe out blogs, online media that report on the iViewit Technology Story. 
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have a web stat that shows WIPO looking at my Notice to WIPO of massive fraud, and then emailing Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation.
Eric Wilbers of WIPO has spoke with Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox regarding this matter. WIPO has been notified of this massive fraud that will affect Intel Shareholders. WIPO has done nothing, that I am aware of, to correct this matter.
Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation knows of the iViewit Technology infringement by Intel, and does nothing to disclose this liability to Shareholders. 
Those involved in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL have received Electronic service and have not responded to any allegations. Intel Corp. INTC Shareholders have a massive liability in this matter. This letter is a NOTICE to Intel Corp Executives, Shareholders, Auditors, Liability Carriers, Insurance Provides and more, to disclose this massive liability, that by LAW Intel Corporation, INTC, Must Disclose.
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have attached the Amended Complaint in this matter and documents of Intel’s Connection to this liability. 
Also note that Portland Oregon Tonkon Torp LLP Law Firm and Mike Morgan of Tonkon Torp are also named in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, as Counter Defendants, Co-Conspirators. Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Portland represented Intel and represented Enron in their bankruptcy, this is very much connected to the Iviewit Technology case and also brings massive financial liability to the shareholders of INTC, Intel Corp.
There is definite action that Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation should have take to disclose this legal action. There is definite action that Bruce Sewell former General Counsel at Intel Corporation should have also taken to disclose this legal action. Bruce Sewell, now General Counsel of APPLE is also a named Defendant in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, as is APPLE Executive Steve Dowling.
This Notice of Claim serves as a warning to INTC, Intel Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers, CEO’s, and all companies and people connected to INTC, Intel Financially for any reason of the massive, pending liability to Intel Corporation, INTC.
INTC, Intel has violated NDA’s with Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology.  INTC, Intel is named in Federal RICO Complaints, SEC Complaints and more, in regard to massive liability over the infringement of the iViewit Video Technology, which is said to be worth 13 Trillion Dollars.
Knowing the liability that Intel, INTC has over the iViewit Video Technology, and violations of agreements with Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology, Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation recently conspired with WIPO and WIPO Panelist Peter L. Michaelson, to take Domain Names from Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, and Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, who had been reporting on the iViewit Technology theft for 3 years. 
Peter L. Michaelson has conspired with the Plaintiff in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL in order to launch a public defamation , disgrace, and discrediting campaign by officially stating in WIPO Complaints, WIPO Publications, WIPO Decisions, and WIPO Legal Announcements to the World, that Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, and Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox are guilty of the crime of extortion, of which neither Eliot Bernstein, Founder of iViewit and one of the iViewit Inventors, nor Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox have been charged with, under investigation for, nor prosecuted of. 
This action by Peter L. Michaelson and the Plaintiff in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, was intentionally to discredit and silence the reporting of the world’s biggest technology crime. Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox has filed counterclaims against all those conspiring with the Plaintiff in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, and with good reason. 
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, have attached correspondence between Intel, INTC and Eliot Bernstein, here are links to further information regarding the massive liability to INTC, Intel Corp. Shareholders, Insurance Carriers and Intel Executives.
Links to Documents proving this massive Liability to INTC, Intel Shareholders, Auditors, Insurance Providers, CEO’s, and all companies and people connected to INTC, Intel Financially for any reason. 

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/nda%20violators.pdf

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/130695905/iviewittv_CompanyDocs_United-States-District-Court-Southern-District-NY_20090306-Intel-Demand-Letter-_-Liability-Exposure--Signed-3549l

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=intc

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=498

http://www.rayfordwilkins.com/2012/10/intel-corp-intc-refuse-to-disclose.html

http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/2010/10/intel-general-counsel-bruce-sewell.html

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf

http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, am an Investigative Blogger, I have read thousands of pages of documents over 3 years, listened to Senate Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings, read depositions, read billing documents, listening to depositions, read court filings, read NDA agreements, and massive amounts of proof of the liability that Intel has. This is an Important issue and by LAW must be disclosed. 
I, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, intend to file this Notice with the SEC, 7 days after sending this official notice to INTC, Intel Corporation.
I have read SEC Complaints, RICO Complaints, USPTO Complaints, NDA Agreements, Contracts, and massive amounts of documented proof of the rightful Inventors and owner of the iViewit Technology that 99% of ALL video uses today, and I feel it is my duty to Warn INTC Investors, shareholders, auditors, insurance providers, ceos and more regarding this massive liability. 
Upon my knowledge and belief, Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation has directly conspired to silence me, Pro Se Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, as I have been reporting on the iViewit Technology theft for over 3 years. Due to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation conspiring to remove my online media regarding the iViewit Technology theft,  I have filed legal action against Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation personally and professionally, and against the INTC Company for 10 Million Each. This is a serious and valid claim and is in response to Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation and other Counter Defendants and Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL directly attacking me, defaming me, suppressing my online news media blogs, in order to SUPPRESS the flow of information regarding their involvement and liability in the iViewit Technology Theft.

Pro Se Counter Plaintiff 
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
Whistleblower Media
Crystal Cox News
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Monday, February 18, 2013

District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL; Nevada SLAPP Lawsuit, Nevada Retaliation Lawsuit, Chilling Effect Lawsuit, First Amendment Threat Lawsuit, Freedom of Expression Suppression Lawsuit. Transparency and Accountability DEMANDED in the Courts. Equality of Law and the First Amended DEMANDED.


        Judicial Rulings, Order by Judge Gloria Navarro


District of Nevada Docket Entry 14 Regarding TRO, Preliminary Injunction
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/146014867/District-of-Nevada-Docket-Entry-14-Regarding-TRO-Preliminary-Injunction



Docket Entry 41District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Judge Gloria M. Navarro Ruling Granting Preliminary Injunction to Plaintiff.


District of Nevada Docket Entry 76 Deny Powers to Order Investigation of Plaintiff

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/146014868/District-of-Nevada-Docket-Entry-Deny-Powers-to-Order-Investigation-of-Plaintiff


For More information regarding Nevada SLAPP Suit, Chilling Effect Lawsuit, First Amendment Suppression Lawsuit, Freedom of Expression Suppression Lawsuit, Click Below



                     District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Docket Entries
                                         Where Judge Gloria Navarro Made a RULING.

Docket Entry 11
ORDER Granting 9 Motion for CM/ECF Access. Ms. Cox must provide certification that she has completed the CM/ECF Tutorial on or before 1/11/13. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) (Entered: 12/12/2012)


Docket Entry 14
ORDER Granting 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2013 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7D before Judge Gloria M. Navarro re 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 12/28/2012. Replies due by 1/4/2013. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered: 12/17/2012)


Docket Entry 27
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro, on 1/4/2013. denying 22 Motion to Request This Court Investigate Plaintiff Marc Randazza. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered: 01/04/2013)


Docket Entry 35
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 1/7/2013 before Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Crtrm Administrator: Michael Zadina; Pla Counsel: Ronald Green; Def Counsel: None present; Court Reporter/FTR #: Araceli Bareng; Time of Hearing: 3:49-4:09 a.m.; Courtroom: 7D;

The Court makes preliminary remarks and hears representations from Mr. Green regarding the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. IT IS ORDERED that 19 Motion for Judges and Clerks to Sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure is DENIED; 20 Motion Requesting the Recusal, Removal of District Judge is DENIED; 31 Motion to Strike Defendant Cox's Reply to Response is DENIED; and 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Mr. Green shall file a proposed order consistent with the Court's ruling.
(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MJZ) (Entered: 01/08/2013)



Docket Entry 36
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro, on 1/8/2013. By Deputy Clerk: Michael Zadina.
This case has been assigned to the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: www.nvd.uscourts.gov
(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MJZ) (Entered: 01/08/2013)



Docket Entry 40
ORDER that 16 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/9/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) (Entered: 01/11/2013)


Docket Entry 41
ORDER that 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. (See Order for details). FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall receive a $600 refund from the Court for the six domain names that were transferred pursuant to the WIPO arbitration decision. The Court shall keep the nominal bond of one hundred dollars ($100) for each of the other twenty-six domain names at issue because the evidence indicates that Defendant will suffer only minimal, if any, damage by the issuance of this preliminary injunction. FURTHER ORDERED that 19 MOTION for Judges and Clerks to Sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 20 MOTION for Judge Gloria Navarro to Recuse Herself is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 31 Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendant Crystal Coxs Fugitive Surreply to Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/11/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: cc Finance - MMM) (Entered: 01/11/2013)


Docket Entry 76
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment: Opposition due twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due fourteen (14) days after the filing of the opposition. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) (Entered: 02/12/2013)


Posted here by 
Pro Se Defendant / Pro Se Counter Plaintiff
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Crystal@CrystalCox.com 

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Counter Defendants of Nevada Slapp Case, Free Speech Threat, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL published defamatory statements with ‘actual malice,’ against counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, yet they have NO LIABILITY and are above the LAW. Counter Defendants of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and Defendants of Rakofsky V. The Internet, Rule the Courts, Dominate the "legal blogsphere", and control the illusion of "Legal Commentary".


Counter Defendants and Alleged Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL published defamatory statements with ‘actual malice,’ against counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, meaning they had knowledge that the statements they were posting were false and they went ahead with reckless disregard of whether they were false or not and posted these defamatory false statement.  Times v. Sullivan, Nov. 30 Op. at 5, 1 ER 39. 

Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox cannot recover damages without proof that Counter Defendant was negligent and Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox may not recover presumed damages absent of proof of actual malice as in Gertz, 418 U.S. at 347.” Id. at 9, 1 ER 43.

Clearly in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Counter Defendants had actual malice, they posted FALSE STATEMENTS knowing the information was false, and therefore cannot hide behind the skirt of Gertz, and Times V. Sullivan as a reason, adefense to have defamed me, Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, Deliberately and with Actual Malice. And somehow have no liability what so ever.

There is clear, blatant and OBVIOUS proof that Counter Defendants were seriously, deliberately, negligent, and had blatant, boldly lit, obvious, ACTUAL MALICE.

Why are These Attorneys Above the Law? Why do these NPR Reporters, Forbes Journalists, Fraud File Investigators, New York Times Journalists, and Law Firms get a Free Pass to defame and to violate the laws they are allegedly there to defend, to report on, to investigate? Why do the laws not apply to them? Is it because I am Pro Se? Is it because they own the courts, or have mafia ties and other massive money and power behind them?

Seriously, it is Obvious they Defamed me cruelly, maliciously and yet they have no liability, and on top of that SUE me, and those connected to me and get judgments, rulings, injunctions for whatever they want; with no due process or constitutional rights for me, WHY?